The development of agriculture was arguably one of the most important things that happened in recent prehistory. The ability to feed large populations in a compact area allowed the global human population to explode from the thousands to the billions in a relatively short period of time. For this reason, modern science knows a good bit about the emergence of agriculture: archaeological data show that the establishment of larger, more complex civilizations was associated with evidence of intentional food production and manipulation. It is relatively straightforward science and easy to recognize once you know what you’re looking for. The majority of mainstream academics and archaeologists agrees that small-scale farming first arose between 10,000 and 15,000 years ago. Agriculture arose independently in several different areas of the world at different times. Robert Sepehr however, disagrees. In his book Species With Amnesia, Sepehr details his belief that the myth of Atlantis was a factual historical account of an ancient advanced civilization. Throughout the book he presents evidence that he claims has been suppressed. One pillar of his argument for an advanced civilization during the Ice Age is that Cro-Magnon peoples practiced agriculture. Sepehr (page 49) states that “a number of sites, dating back as far as 16,000 B.C, evidence the practice of agriculture. . . . Professional anthropologists realize that without agriculture, Atlantis, or any other antediluvian civilization, is no more than a myth.” We know that Plato provided the first written account of Atlantis around 360 BCE. At the time that he wrote, he claimed Atlantis was at least 9,000 years old. This would imply then that because agriculture is vital to the support of a large sedentary civilization, full-scale agricultural techniques would have to have been in practice a minimum of 11,400 years ago. Sepehr’s phrasing of his assertion for agriclture at 16,000 BC is key as it is tactfully non-specific. “A number of sites” implies a number substantial enough to support a claim. But Sepeher gives the reader no clue as to precisely how many. “Dating back as far as…” is not definitively wrong, as there are sites with evidence of domestication dating back millennia. He does, however, seem to be stretching the truth: the origins of agriculture are well studied and documented and there is no reason to believe that it was a common practice 6,000 years before the generally accepted timeline. Sepehr doesn’t provide information to reference his claim of multiple significant sites so the reader is left to trust his personal opinion. If Sepehr's claim were true, it would be exciting news for the archaeological community, so it is also unclear why he then implies archaeologists are rejecting evidence that supports this dating. It is the opposite of the scientific attitude to reject viable evidence simply because it does not fit within the parameters of your current hypothesis. Yet this is the implication embedded within Sepehr’s book, in this section and in many others. Species With Amnesia seems to be written with the intent of seeding mainstream doubt for the academic community. As Sepehr notes, without agriculture there is no Atlantis. So if his story about the Cro-Magnon is true, there should be evidence of agriculture associated with those populations all during the Ice Age. But there's not. It is apparent that what Robert Sepehr wishes to find and what he has actually confirmed are two different things, but that is perhaps why he does not go into detail. Robert Sepehr is a vocal supporter of hyperdiffusionism and this book is an integral part of the career he is trying to build around this theory. His belief that all advanced civilizations come from a single traceable ancestral line of Atlanteans simply does not have any proven scientific evidence. He does however attempt to prop up his theories using his speculation about Cro-Magnon invasions along the British Isles and Europe. Sepehr’s narrative outlines a story of refugees from an unstable land off the coast of northern Europe. These refugees he believes, evacuated regularly on a cycle of environmental destruction every few thousand years until one final natural disaster caused total collapse. Sepehr then connects his tale to the more ancient one of the 9,000 BCE demise of Atlantis. Supporting evidence here is lacking but this is where Sepehr’s assertions of a more ancient agriculture trend come into play. Robert Sepehr’s claims are problematic, and the underlying implications of those claims are worth examining. His “alternative diffusionist arguments” tend to focus on his concepts of race and add a tone of reverence for the glorious past he believes only some humans share. When reading Sepehr’s claims within his book it becomes apparent that he is willing to stretch legitimate scientific claims in order to fit it to his greater framework of an Ice Age advanced civilization. His claims that agriculture was widely practiced before the commonly accepted Holocene dating is nonsense. There is no accepted evidence to date that supports widespread agriculture during the Ice Age.
79 Comments
John
4/4/2017 04:56:40 am
Dear Kate,
Reply
David
10/17/2017 01:25:48 am
John..... "Crystal resonance to levitate stone" Hahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahaha..... and you really expect people to take your ramblings seriously????? !!!
Reply
KEK
11/8/2017 10:05:59 am
Your reading comprehension is weak. Everything has a resonance frequency, look into car design and what they do to avoid it.
B.BarNavi
11/22/2017 11:46:11 am
Really bro? You're comparing what goes on a minor scale to large heavy objects of heterogeneous composition?
Shawn
11/20/2018 02:44:40 am
David yea, hahahahahahahahaha that's almost as stupid as saying the same matter can be at two places at one time until someone observes that matter....how stupid hahahahaha....wait, that's how superposition on those quantum computers works, isn't it? The point is that even though it's counterintuitive to your narrow minded view, doesn't mean it's a stupid hypothesis. If you don't know what he's speaking of, then check out Machu Pichu for the precise cuts. Simply search ancient megaliths for weights that institutionalized science cannot give a satisfactory explanation as to how they were lifted, transported, and set; sometimes high on mountain tops. If you can't offer a better explanation, it's best to just keep your ridicule to yourself.
tim
5/29/2021 05:45:23 am
David....
yolanda marroquin
12/27/2021 09:21:49 am
Robert- your spot on-Atlantis existed as Mu,Lemeria,many historys have come and gone-now being unearthed-discovered,your leading the way-They had to feed the masses-Agriculture is natural by-product of civilizations-
David's Mommy
5/13/2022 03:57:18 pm
David, you were birthed form my anus. Sorry, but it's true. Love, Mom
Charles Martel
10/9/2018 02:26:29 pm
Dear mr. Sepehr:
Reply
Sean
3/17/2020 03:44:38 am
"you are asuming a very racist position by claiming all civilizations come from white, blue-eyed individuals"
Sean
3/17/2020 06:31:46 am
I forgot to include some links.
Mike
10/20/2018 03:59:51 pm
Also the catch phrase Species with Amnesia is a term coined by Graham Hancock. Robert Sepher literally takes grahams writings and Plagiarizes statements phrases i could go on and on.
Reply
Corroborate this genetive paradox 7 years later
3/19/2021 05:40:29 pm
Please, Give Mr. Hancock his due indeed. Align and present his work not as competition but as a supportive beam in the structure that appears to be coming forth from above the influence of establishment and privilege. Scientific processes may not be capable of providing a coherent narrative alongside the unfolding discoveries so presenters and story tellers will always be heard even if the establishment and privileged have closed their eyes, ears, mouths, hearts and minds, on the matter.
Tom
6/7/2019 03:17:01 pm
Yea, I agree. This article is a hit job. Giants stolen by the Smithsonian never to be seen again. Megalythic cities submerged off every continent. And to the lack of research of this author... Graham Hancock has scubu dived to explore MANY(huge number that I am not going to make up) submerged megalythic sites.
Reply
Yolanda Marroquin
12/27/2021 09:55:54 am
Practice awareness" pearls before swine"-You try- my friend-As a well known Countess once said when presenting a lecture on enlightenment,'For those who do not wish to hear of how cultures lead to Arts&evolution-There are bananas out back for their pleasure as well as tall trees-As for those who wish to hear of cilizations advancements,there IS fruitsalad & wines for all.
Reply
William Greer
4/4/2017 07:30:08 am
Kate's closing argument about the lack of evidence (in this case for an older agriculture) seems weak to me. If a substantial land was catastrophically lost, is it not reasonable to assume that substantial evidence was lost with it? Also, what the geological record contains is certainly quite different from what authorities have managed to find.
Reply
will
7/9/2017 10:48:26 am
Its obvious you are an bigoted troll. You are a mouthpiece for the status quo of ignorance and enemy of the white race. You are so jealous and short sighted, mean and haterful to think you have all the answers. You cannot think outside your box and dont want anyone else to! You are part of the evil that keeps us in the dark!
Reply
B.BarNavi
11/22/2017 11:42:36 am
Why is it that "the white race" is predicated on the distortion of science and the historical record?
Reply
Lilla
9/26/2018 08:32:14 am
The white race is a concept estabilished by non-Germanic Europeans to claim racial superiority, becase your dumbass brains are still stuck in the 40s. The "Aryan" those nazis were talking about was a phenotype, not a race and they would probably call you an untermensch anyway.
Reply
Inquirer
10/22/2017 05:41:12 am
I have far more respect for Robert Sepehr's research and truthfulness than for this Kate's hysterical rantings. Kate who again? She will eventually find out she was wrong.
Reply
B.BarNavi
11/22/2017 11:43:34 am
I saw a cogent rebuttal, and only a cultist raving in response.
Reply
B.BarNavi
11/22/2017 11:44:40 am
You must've hit a nerve, huh? Fringe theorists might scream persecution, but in the end they can't stand up to scrutiny.
Reply
Tom Jones
12/15/2017 03:26:50 pm
I find Kate's argument quite cogent, not "hysterical rantings" as Inquirer characterized them. (Why must a woman's opinion so often be characterized that way?) Having just listened to several of Robert Sepehr's YouTube videos, and being a trained scientist who follows archeology and the current research on ancient human DNA extractions/studies (and being a northern European with much red-haired, blue-eyed DNA, and familial links to various UK ancient monarchy), I have many of the same reservations of Robert Sepehr's videos that Kate does. Robert's timelines make little to no sense, he conflates things that are more than 100,000 years old with things that are 30,000 years old. William Greer's argument against Kate's argument about a lack of evidence for older agriculture is specious, as once any group leaving a putative "Atlantis" would have within short order have to had set up agriculture for their society's growth. It's far too easy to use the excuse of the key 'location' you need for your theories (whether Atlantis or Doggerland) to be "underwater". And John, "research" is not just when you read someone else's work and write about it - go out and actually DO some original research - THEN you can call it research. Your book (or online) reading is a pastime. Face it folks, Sepehr uses a handful of correct and interesting facts (yes, there is probably some serious relationship between Basques and Berbers, and certainly some genetic track from Egypt north to Europe) - but this is NOT realistic evidence for an Atlantic continent off the western coast of Europe/Africa. Yes, cro-magnons and Neanderthals interbred - but they were both HUMANS, and created viable and FERTILE offspring. Equating those people to Ligers and Tigons, which are generally infertile (for cytogentic reasons) is scientifically fallacious. And yes, interbreeding between cro-magnon, Neanderthal, Denisovians, etc., most certainly took place, and we are essentially all interbred from these human pre-species - but Sepehr ignores the genetic evidence that these ALL likely led back to Africa as well - and that as each group left Africa, at different times, that each group encountered expected mutations followed by geographic/genetic bottlenecks creating very different looking sub-species with distinct different genetic tendencies. When they re-encountered each other, interbreeding resumed, creating the modern human genotype, with DNA from all of them. The only exceptions are certain very long-term isolated tribes who have not been subject to modern (last ~35,000 years) interbreeding. We're all from Africa folks.
Reply
Shawn
11/20/2018 02:24:54 am
While there are several points on which I agree, the smug prickness with which you presented them is disgusting. A minor disagreement, but one in which you should be immediately instructed, is that a discerning individual can do quality research on the internet if one knows how to filter reliable information from BS. I mean, you do know that the web originally began as a tool to transmit scholarly information between some Ca universities, right? One can find PDFs for just about any research paper on the internet. Maybe you should do some "real" research before you go spouting off. Also, I agree that we are all a genetic mixture by this point in history but to claim knowledge that we all originated out of Africa is simply conjecture. What example do you claim for proof? Lucy, the discredited Bonobo 🐵??? The non-bipedal, oops there's a baboon bone we accidentally mixed in for years, evo theory proving, artistic misrepresentation??? Have you never wondered at how ALL of the world's "deepest history" comes from arid landscapes? Do you think that it's possible we may be able to see and recognize ancient structures and fossils because there's not much vegetation to get in the way??? Come on guy. Use your brain. If you want to talk about the evidence we have found leads toward such n such; I can buy that. To speak in definites about prehistory is definitely short sighted, naivety.
Reply
TickTock
10/30/2019 03:30:14 pm
WOW Shawn... spoke like someone who got his doctorate off of internet research...
Danielle
4/6/2019 09:08:55 pm
I love u ,u r awesome. Whatever u do in life may it be prosperous and fun . Wish there were more people in the world with ur objectivity. Mr. Tom Jones thank u , I appreciate u
Reply
Lynn Kelley
5/12/2019 05:16:20 am
Thanks, Kate, Tom Jones, B. BarNavi, for your factual, cogent arguments. I hope your efforts will awaken the multitudes who are so starved for truth they latch onto any pseudo-science that doesn't bore them with scholarship (footnotes indicating the kind of work good research requires are never used by Sepehr, et. al., because--well, it's easier for them to accept the racism and fear-based biases their parents taught them if they accept conspiracists' at face value. It's far easier for the con artist to tell them not to question because conspiracies, like religions, only thrive if they are accepted on faith.
Reply
Shin
11/12/2020 05:41:33 pm
What are you even talking about? It's one thing to critique a man's theories, but you are attacking his viewers - as if you know anything about them.
Chaz
1/29/2022 02:25:51 pm
Oh Lynn, you've obviously spent an excessive amount of time at one of the indoctrination campuses, where virtue signaling about "equity" is now enforced by "mandate". You and your ilk demand that anyone to the right of Leon Trotsky, be silenced and lose their employment. It's always a laugh to hear the vitriol and contempt ooze through in a leftists nonsense. You reach for your grab bag of slander and hate, crying about "cherry picked partial truths" or "faux philosophy" or you pull out silly comparisons around MAGA and Adolph? Its you who is "hateful and divisive" and your inversion of truth doesn't convince anyone, other than your little gang of ADL trolls
TickTock
10/30/2019 03:38:50 pm
Well said Tom Jones. I do get tired of non-academics or academics from other disciplines spouting spurious speal, or outright fallacious arguments, confusing the subject at hand.
Reply
mike
12/22/2019 07:08:35 pm
Why must the gender of the writer be relevant? Because it is so often the case that there is no other defense to the inane ramblings of the intellectually dishonest than to revert to politically correct name calling.
Reply
Adversary
1/16/2020 10:02:30 pm
You do know that the out of Africa THEORY has been challenged and debunked through new findings in DNA and archaeology.
Reply
DINDUNUFFINS
3/14/2020 04:02:41 pm
No we ARE NOT all out of Africa .You weak cuck degenerate loser.
Reply
Shin
11/12/2020 05:11:07 pm
Tom,
Reply
Kc
2/21/2018 04:23:24 pm
I just want everybody and everything to be black.
Reply
Kc
2/25/2021 05:13:44 am
Follow up to this: it's true, I do. I know Robert is absolutely wrong. Thank you Kate.
Reply
Stig
5/15/2018 10:37:20 am
We know that Plato provided the first *commonly accepted and known* written account of Atlantis around 360 BCE.
Reply
Kal
6/9/2018 01:42:25 am
At some point everyone's statements could be brought into question.............. Now I understand questioning sources, but look at the Plethora of sychophant Sources your going to find that support the Macro-Evoloution of humanity. When it's still "A Theory". Regardless of how technical they want to go, or get w/ the contextual definition of "Theory". All that Sourced Evoloutionary citing which doesn't take in to A count things as simple As the ancient 'Gobekli Tepé ruins. Or ALL The facts when it comes to the 'Cambrian soil'. Or even ancient Myths that speak of God's making man. Coming from different parts of the world, via ancient civilizations that didn't cross polinate. Or at least DIDNT according to mainstream historians. Thus they side-step certain elements of one thing to make "their Science" more suitable and convincing at another thing. In conclusion when you know there is A conspiracy at the root of academia {Which they're is, look no further than Sasquatch/ Bigfoot}- WHAT CAN'T ONE NOT QUESTION!
Reply
GeorgeKaplan
7/3/2018 05:05:53 pm
"It is the opposite of the scientific attitude to reject viable evidence simply because it does not fit within the parameters of your current hypothesis. "
Reply
Adam
7/8/2018 06:19:47 pm
I have to comment on the comments to this blogpost.
Reply
Bob
4/2/2019 06:33:17 pm
In terms of the way in which Kate's post is being dismissed by some, I agree wholeheartedly.
Reply
Y'all wild
9/10/2020 09:25:51 pm
Awww poor baby she was called a chick
Reply
8/2/2018 12:52:40 am
A common thing that is shared by almost all websites - casinos and 'playing rooms' alike - that give people platforms to play poker online is the instant poker bonuses they tend to offer. At the most basic level, the workings of these instant poker bonuses are quite understandable, as they tend to fall into two main categories: namely, instant bonuses that become available to poker players by virtue of their just registering with whichever online casino or playing room happens to be offering them, and even before depositing any money into their poker playing accounts (hence their also being called no deposit poker bonuses); and those that become available to poker players upon their depositing money into their poker playing accounts.
Reply
James
8/19/2018 06:20:49 am
The world needs to stop using the word conspiracy. That word today is used only to dis credit, make fun of or attempt to stop individuals from research and asking questions. Conspiracy - a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.
Reply
Sandra
3/31/2019 10:35:30 am
You hit the nail on the ahead. Bullseye!
Reply
PAT
9/13/2018 04:48:19 pm
Kate, I see in reading through the comments you were/are a student doing an assignment. I apologizes for the rude mentality many jackasses have on the internet. I hope this does not turn you away from archaeology if you enjoy it. I have enjoyed it since my first college class in archaeology.
Reply
Truth hurts
9/10/2020 09:32:58 pm
Dont listen to him dont waste your time or your money education is a racket- you pay to lose your ability to think for yourself and become indoctrinated. This system failed us all... just because you had an assignment doesn't mean you have a special privilege to have the world veiled from you this is what it's like and it only gets worse as you get older. The fighting among ourselves and the polarization of people through conflicting ideas pushed by the mass media runs the masses. I'm not sure even if our society will be functional enough in the next decade or so where you might be able to survive let alone start a career... really you should be hoarding food and guns
Reply
Lana Lorenzen
9/30/2018 11:42:45 am
(Bachelors, 1980, U. C. Berkeley, The History and Archaeology of the Ancient Near East)There's a very interesting book written concerning the question of ancient and yet sophisticated cultures outside the typical archaeological framework from geophysics as well as articles that also relate to archaeology from the field of coronal ejections. Personally, I've always suspected that there was a great deal of information that was related but missing from the traditional timeline. But my profession, after Berkeley, didn't include work in the Near East and so I didn't pursue any of my ideas. The books include the ones written by Robert M. Schoch, Ph.D. (geology, geophysics from Yale) but especially Forgotten Civilization. The other concerns the work of Anthony L. Peratt, a plasma physicist who became interested in ancient petroglyphs. His articles and research can be found in the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Plasma Science and other sources. Dr. Peratt speaks to two issues: the comparison of specific symbols that were created world-wide by different cultures, and their exact counterparts created by massive plasma events; and, the devastating and cataclysmic consequences to the planet caused by said events. A lot of my questions have been answered.
Reply
Hey wait a minute!
11/13/2018 02:35:45 pm
Everyone here is sounding semi-david Attenborough-ish. Yall are talking about these ridiculous non-existent timelines. If someone could prove to me that there are records of anything, (not just assertions of existing records) older than 6k years, that would be great. Really, I don't mean to sound harsh, but to me, acting off what I believe, it sounds as ludicrous as that creepy perv guy who posits evolution to you whilst you watch lions eating animals, in a british accent. It's quite funny really.
Reply
Bob
4/2/2019 05:56:11 pm
I think that instead of someone having to prove it to you, why not make the effort to sort fact from fiction as opposed to starting from your preconceived notion and then categorically dismissing everything that doesn't agree with it. My take from your comment, (which is only my opinion and not fact) is that you seem not interested in discovering our history, but intent on clinging to your beliefs as badly as Attenborough clings to his.
Reply
Jacques
1/15/2019 09:48:11 am
I am not a scientist at all, so I would like to get some clarity:
Reply
Bob
4/2/2019 06:00:37 pm
Ha! Damn good point. Speculations begets more speculation which is told by people to other people until it is repeated so often it becomes an absolute fact. But then, that's what I heard....
Reply
Dennisland
3/12/2019 02:09:22 am
Science is a flawed religion. It is at best theoretical and dogmatic. Scientific evidence, because of phenomenon it fails to acknowledge, has similar plausibility to a clairvoyant like Edgar Cayce..
Reply
Sandra
3/31/2019 10:38:45 am
Bullseye again!
Reply
bob
4/2/2019 06:20:32 pm
Being facetious, I take it you never use a car, get on an airplane or use electricity?
Reply
mike
12/22/2019 07:12:03 pm
Straw man...but you probably knew that.
sandra
3/31/2019 10:33:17 am
Theories are just that "theories." Kate sounds almost like she is jealous of Robert who has made a career out of a very difficult career to be successful in. Are you just a "wanna be" Kate?
Reply
Dodee giebas
4/9/2019 08:52:20 pm
Part of the history of humanity was “hidden behind the iron curtain” for many years. What about the Vikings who were spread from Scandinavia across the British isles and Russia to Turkey and the Silk Road? What about the Cossacks?
Reply
Christian
11/28/2019 05:04:37 am
There's a document that was recently declassified by CIA called "The Adam and Eve Story" by Chan Thomas. In this document, it's suggested that the sun undergoes a heating/cooling cycle that spans 10-12,000 years that has a cataclysmic impact on earth by way of shifting our planet's polar magnetism.
Reply
Gabriel
6/10/2020 04:19:07 am
Well, having read both article and comments I see several things. There are such tremendous fallacies and failed logical thinking in the whole spectrum of positions. I will start with comments.
Reply
Sean
11/14/2020 06:03:19 am
Then care to explain the following?
Reply
Dan
7/4/2020 06:13:13 am
I started watching Robert Sepehr's video's on You Tube. Im not a trained anything just a history fan but I got the feeling pretty quickly that they designed to sell books.In one of his vids he quotes Laurence Gardiner who wrote Davinci Code sort of rubbish. An anthropogist who quotes Laurence Gardiner! Seriously! Come on people. Get a grip on reality.
Reply
2/17/2021 10:00:27 am
The work of Carl Woese changed the linear model of Darwin; with specific regard to human evolution. Sepehr is pointing that out. We evolved in parallel tracks. At this point, no one should challenge that. Aryans didn’t evolve out of Africa. There is nothing in their base DNA/RNA sequence that is homologous to Africa! Globalist dominated academia can not afford to admit this.
Reply
marie
11/24/2020 12:11:26 pm
Kate, thank you for sharing this. I found your article as I was looking for a review of Sepehr's work. I got this, and a whole lot more in the comments section. And now I am going to lift my jaw from the floor that someone actually had the audacity to call an intelligent woman "hysterical" because she has some thoughts. Talk about Cro-Magnon...
Reply
You're talking about Robert Sepehr not being credible but you're writing this on a fucking Weebly site. Where are your references? You don't know how to write a scholarly article? Where is your YouTube channel? And a slightly more pressing question: where is your domain name.
Reply
2/17/2021 09:49:56 am
Carl Woese laid the groundwork that has revealed the fallacy of Darwinian evolution. No one in science today challenges that. Sepehr is pointing that out, as MANY scientists admit, that human evolution occurred in separate tracks. He is only applying what genetics has made clear. This should not be so hard to embrace unless, as usual, your tenure and pensions rely on academic conformity.
Reply
Final Veredict
2/24/2021 07:09:10 pm
THANKS KATE. Yes, there's no evidence of agriculture beyond 10,000 years. so Sepher's claim is debunked pretty easily. He's wrong by "only" 6,000 years and has nothing to back up his imaginary claim.
Reply
Final Veredict
6/26/2021 03:48:14 am
Is that all? LoL. Wrong.
Linda Steel
3/6/2021 06:13:32 am
Unfortunately, being open minded and allowing the evidence to take you where it will is something mainstream scientists have forgotten how to do. Just ask Victoria Steen-McIntyre
Reply
kim
5/24/2021 06:54:53 pm
My question is where is his qualifications? I've watched his Youtube videos, i've read his books. Most authors list qualifications, education etc. There is nothing about this guy on the web? Is he a self proclaimed archaeologist? Or is he pedigreed? There are a lot of well read people in this world pretending to be something they are not... I just find it odd... he has so many blind followers, that no one has bothered to see his formal education. But then again, look how many believe the media and this scamdemic we just had..lol. I mean so really... who is this guy?
Reply
Vlad
6/3/2021 03:43:21 pm
"It is the opposite of the scientific attitude to reject viable evidence simply because it does not fit within the parameters of your current hypothesis. "
Reply
Shackleford
10/17/2021 10:11:49 pm
Sepehr is also the individual responsible for the aliases:
Reply
Mon Oncle
11/5/2021 05:07:10 am
There are always others my friend, always.
Reply
2/13/2022 07:39:00 pm
To Robert Sepehr,
Reply
Mohammad
3/3/2022 08:46:57 am
Hello. Please guide me if you have a free download link for the book
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |